The Devolution of Florida’s Sex Offender Registry since Smith vs. Doe in 2003
(Weekly Update #163)
Dear Members and Advocates,
This week’s update is somewhat of a continuation of last week’s. Last week, I shared an important revelation; that Smith v. Doe DID NOT find that registration is not punishment. It only found that the pre-2003 version of Alaska’s registry was not punitive. Following up on that concept and in anticipation of our Monthly Member call, we wanted to see what Florida’s registry looked like at the time the Supreme Court decided Smith v. Doe (2003) and compare it to what the registry looks like today.
Florida’s registry was enacted in 1997. At it’s inception, someone convicted of a few serious sex offenses would be required to report within 48 Hours after establishing a permanent or temporary residence in the state and provide his or her name, date of birth, race, sex, height, weight, hair and eye color, tattoos or other identifying marks, and address of permanent or legal residence. Thereafter, within 48 hours of a change in address they would need to report to DHSMV (the local driver’s license office) to update their address. That’s where it all started. You register, provide some basic information, and if you move you need to update your driver’s license (which you’d need to do anyhow).
The following year, 1998, the list of requirements got a bit longer. Not only did they add some additional offenses that qualified for the list, but they collected some additional information, such as your social security number, occupation and place of employment, post office boxes, vehicle identification number, license tag number, registration number, a description including color scheme, hull identification number, manufacturer’s serial number, name of vessel, registration number and description including color scheme. They also added a requirement that law enforcement come out and verify the address you gave them and not only would the data be available to law enforcement, but they would make it available to the public via internet notification. You could, however, petition for removal after 20 years.
In 2000, they required out-of-state addresses to be registered and provided that county and local law enforcement should regularly perform address verifications. And in 2002 they added even more qualifying offenses and required that people who are required to register for offenses in other states have to register if moving here (and even if you only had a 10 year requirement in your state of conviction you are on for life here). They also required you to register enrollment at an institution of higher education or changes to employment within 48 hours.
Just to give you some perspective, that’s pretty much where Florida was at the time of Smith v. Doe. Already worse than it was in Alaska, but rest assured; it only got worse. In 2004 addresses for temporary locations (not just where you live) needed to be reported and if you reported that you were vacating an address and subsequently failed to leave, that’s a 2nd degree felony. That year registration violations became strict liability offenses, meaning that you can be prosecuted for unknowing violations. Perhaps the biggest change in 2004 was the addition of residency restrictions at the state level.
In 2005, they required semi-annual registration and 2007 was a whopper… semi-annual wasn’t frequent enough, so for some registrants they required quarterly registration. They also added even more qualifying offenses, required the disclosure of email addresses, instant messenger accounts and other internet identifiers. They also branded our drivers licenses. They tacked on an additional 5 years before someone can petition for removal and further added that some enumerated offenses could never petition!
In 2009 they required registration of home and cell numbers. In 2010 transient registrants (which by now had become plenty because most municipalities have passed residency restrictions) had to register the intersection or bridge they were living at. In 2012 they added even more qualifying offenses. And, in 2013 they required the collection of even more biometric information.
So since Smith v. Doe they added more information required to be reported, more frequent in person reporting, harsher penalties, residency restrictions, branded drivers licenses… but they were not done yet. In 2014 we were hit with the “scorched earth” year of changes to the registry. That year, the legislature added even more qualifying offenses. More “internet identifier” information had to be disclosed. You had to register not only your own vehicles, but anyone who lives in your house or stays there for 5 days or any cars you or they lease or rent (in person). You had to provide your passport information, immigration status, any professional licenses you have, volunteer status, even more biometric information (genetic markers, DNA), transients now have to report every 30 days and if you leave the country you have to report 21 days in advance (in person, of course).
Head spinning yet? Too much to remember? Better not forget something or it’s a third degree felony! Anyhow, we’re not done piling on yet, so let’s keep going. In 2016 even more qualifying offenses were added and international travel reporting was expanded. In 2017 the “corresponding website, homepage or application software” for each internet identifier was added and in 2018 came another doozy! “Residence” was now someplace you stayed 3 or more days, even in the aggregate, per year (it was previously 5 days and originally it was 14 days). In other words, if you go away for a long weekend, you are required to make an in-person trip to the sheriff’s office (or DHSMV, or both) to report your travel. Also in 2018, the penalty for violating one of these technical requirements (even unknowingly) now carries a minimum mandatory sentence and mandatory GPS monitoring. WTF!?!?
Let me put this in perspective… to help me summarize all the changes to the registry for this weekly update (actually, not all, Just the highlights), I prepared a chronology of all the amendments in an excel spreadsheet. My “1997” column has 3 rows and my “2021” column has 52. I’m also only focusing on the Florida Statutes. My notes didn’t include stuff like having a branded passport or being denied access to countries because that’s Federal (International Megan’s Law). My notes also didn’t include stuff like the registration fees in Clay, proximity ordinances that prevent you from attending a County Commission meeting in Brevard, Red signs in front of your home in Bradford or Halloween signs in Duval (just to give you some examples) because those are county ordinances. My notes also didn’t include the collateral consequences, like chronic under/unemployment, not being able to watch your own daughter perform in a school play or your son compete in a soccer tournament, or constantly being the target of scams, harassment and vigilantism. If I had to list all those I’d be too depressed to continue writing this.
As time passed, the number of in-person reporting requirements, burdens and restrictions not only increased, but they became more ridiculous, harsh and severe. Just this past year, for example, it became law that a registrant in Florida presumptively cannot be granted any timesharing with his or her own children in the event of a divorce! How did we go from updating your address to having your children taken away from you? What’s worse is that as draconian as things currently stand, if this is where we’ve come in recent years, think of where we might be a few years down the road!
This Thursday evening we will be holding our monthly member call. The topic for this call will be the evolution of the Florida registry and a legal update to go over some of the things FAC is doing to push back against it. We will give the statuses of Ex Post Facto I & II, the Out of State challenge, removal petitions and cases from around the country that are making a difference. We will talk about why it’s so important for us to do something, but why it’s even more important for us to do it properly. Please join us.
Sincerely,
The Florida Action Committee
Reminders:
Housing is Needed – We receive calls daily from members looking for housing. If you have housing to rent or purchase, please contact email membership@floridaactioncommittee.org or call 833-273-7325, option 1. We will only share the information with the FAC Outreach team and the County Coordinator in your area.
August 5 Thursday at 8:00pm ET – Monthly Member Call – phone 319-527-3487. Topic: Legal Updates and the Perils of Pro Se Motions. If unable to connect, text “CALL ME” to same number to receive call back and be joined to the meeting.
August 12 Thursday at 8:00pm ET – New Member Orientation Call – phone 319-527-3487. Ask questions about the organization, share resources, discuss local issues and learn about volunteer opportunities. If unable to connect, text “CALL ME” to same number to receive call back and be joined to the meeting.
August 14 Saturday – 11:00am-1:00pm ET. Therapist-led Family Support Session via Zoom. Limited participation. Email membership@floridaactioncommittee.com or leave message at 833-273-7325 Option 1 for access to the Monthly group session.
Date TBD 7:00 pm – Fearless Group – Peer-led Support meeting – You are Not Alone. Dial (727) 731-2927. For more information, email daphne.fac@gmail.com
Need to Talk? FAC has peer volunteers that are here to talk one-on-one, call 904-452-8322. Volunteers are not available 24/7 but you will receive a call as soon as possible. If you have an emergency, call 911, or helpline at 1-800-273-8255 or a crisis center (Listing of Crisis Centers and Hotlines)
SOME HEADLINES FROM THE WEEK
After 15 Years, Does the Adam Walsh Act Need Rethinking?
By Derek W. Logue On July 27, the US Marshals Service (USMS) issued a press release[i] celebrating the 15th anniversary of the passage of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA). But the Act continues to be controversial. Many states find it confusing or…
“You’re not in compliance” – STOP these scams
You might think it’s repetitive for us to keep posting warnings about these scams, but we’re going to keep posting them until they are stopped or until law enforcement does something to stop them… or better yet, until the FDLE takes our information offline so we…
MI: Supreme Court says 2011 changes to sex offender law cannot be applied retroactively
Sex offenders whose convictions predated 2011 changes to Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act do not need to comply with those changes, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled Tuesday. The 2011 requirements – which included bans on living within school safety zones and…
Media Committee: Missed opportunity for meaningful juvenile justice reform in Florida
We thank Ms. Tachana Joseph-Marc for her opinion piece in the Florida Times Union: “Guest Column: Another missed opportunity for meaningful juvenile justice reform in Florida”. The major flaw in the vetoed bill, though, was that it excluded those whose offense as a..
MEMBER CALLS
General Membership Call – First Thursday of each month at 8pm ET
New Member Orientation – Second Thursday of each month at 8pm ET.
All Guests must identify their First name and County. No Last Names. Unknown callers will be blocked.
Listen by Phone:
Two options are offered due to various member phone plans.
OPTION 1: Dial (319) 527-3487 No Access code required.
OPTION 2: Dial 605-472-5311 then Enter Show ID: 739392# (long distance rates may apply)
If you have any trouble connecting to the call, text “CALL ME” to 319-527-3487 from your mobile phone.
FreeConferenceCall.com will call you back and connect you to the conference.
With Unity Comes Change -Get Involved and Volunteer Today!
Florida Action Committee
www.floridaactioncommittee.org
info@floridaactioncommittee.org
833-2-REPEAL 833-273-7325
#1 Excellent article, and great list and research. Very well done and thorough for sure.
#2 Every one of these are punishment. Even if one or two were/are not, how does a judge not find at least out of an entire list, just ONE of them punishment?
#3 The answer to why they keep adding stuff? Because they CAN get away with it. Each time a ruling states we are not being punished, an Angel in Heaven loses a feather out of their wings.
Until they (the registry mafia) are stopped, or challenged by a judge, it is just going to get worse. And that is not me being a negative Nancy, we ALL know that is true.
Each day I wake up I anticipate the new post on here. Will it be a victory story or another kick in the privates? You would think with some of these other states like Michigan, winning cases and enjoying victories, a lightbulb would go off somewhere in a judges head.
Myself and others don’t want to be that guy/gal sitting in a wheelchair at 90 years old, in a nursing and the nurse says “Mister Johnson, I have good news, you no longer have to register”. You are so happy that it finally happened 50 years after the registry that you have a heart attack and die right there on the spot.
Florida has been insane longer than I thought and I blamed it on what happened to Senator Book. Was there every any rational justification to expand the requirements or did they just do it anyway because they could? Florida’s laws are like being on steroids might make you stronger; yet does a lot of damage. Now I know why Florida looks like a private part because the state definitely likes peeing on freedom.
Has anyone experienced Texas not removing you from their registry, even if you moved years ago. I just found out they won’t.