13 thoughts on “Most folks are making incorrect assumptions about “minor-attracted persons”

  • August 11, 2022 at 3:03 pm
    Permalink

    Hello, all! I just found this in my Twitter feed. Here are “scientists” talking about launching an investigation to arrest subjects in an experiment who masturbated to Japanese cartoons.

    This makes me so angry, but if I leave a critical comments I’ll look like a “pro child rape” advocate. Here’s the Tweet:

    https://twitter.com/neuro_skeptic/status/1557452366756077568

    Reply
    • August 11, 2022 at 4:04 pm
      Permalink

      Not seeing anything in the link that proposes arrests.

      It’s fair for a publisher to scrutinize how they came to rely on a study that used such material.

      Reply
      • August 11, 2022 at 10:22 pm
        Permalink

        Most of these “controversial” studies are only controversial in the sense they come to conclusions people don’t WANT to hear.

        Reply
        • August 12, 2022 at 8:29 am
          Permalink

          Excellent point, Derek!

          Reply
          • August 12, 2022 at 8:56 am
            Permalink

            The study’s conclusions were not controversial. The methodology was. I would not condone it.

    • August 11, 2022 at 8:02 pm
      Permalink

      People whose main concern is what they look like never change anything and usually look like fools or rogues into the bargain.

      I’m not saying this particular tweet is worth putting time and energy into argumentive commentary. tl/dr. But we have to get in the habit of mixing it up on social media in general. Talking to each other is nice just like talking to your own family is nice, but it’s not everything.

      Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 4:24 pm
    Permalink

    We are at religious levels of moral panic. But this is nothing new. Science is not immune to human biases.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 6:37 pm
    Permalink

    I concur with Jacob. Nothing about arrests, just their excuse/explanation for not having the paper available for reading.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 6:41 pm
    Permalink

    Not in the main Tweet. In the comments on it.

    Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 6:56 pm
    Permalink

    Anyone have a non-YouTube link? Apparently, they already took it down for “violating YT’s ToS” 🙄

    Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 9:49 pm
    Permalink

    Not seeing anything except that the video was removed for violating terms of service

    Reply
  • August 11, 2022 at 11:54 pm
    Permalink

    This is only a clip.. found everywhere on Twitter. The original was over ten minutes long and so far I have not found another copy of it anywhere.

    Reply
    • August 12, 2022 at 10:54 am
      Permalink

      And of course the only place with the clip uses just 2m of it. Afraid of the other 8m I bet.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *