Hawley Leads Bill to Protect Children, Toughen Sentences for Child Porn Offenders
U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced theĀ PROTECT Act of 2022, which protects children from sexual exploitation by enhancing the penalties for possessing child pornography and by preventing judges from sentencing offenders below federal guidelines. The bill is co-sponsored by Senators Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Representative Ken Buck (CO-4) is introducing companion legislation in the House of Representatives.
Just saw a segment on the news about a new reality show on Discovery Plus that has a young mom posing as a child to ensnare men in the traps of online (dare I say it?) human trafficking. She claims to alert LE as a private citizen doing this. But she also admitted on Water’s World (Fox News Host Jesse Waters) that she actually uses real minor to have explicit chats with grown men. Anyone else see a problem here?
If she admitted publicly to enticing minors into engaging in sex chat, then she needs a lawyer. Do we have a clip of her admitting this?
The clip was from Water’s World on Fox. You can get a clip from them, if you want. Or you can watch her reality show on Discovery Plus, if you want. It’s all there. Not like she’s hiding what she’s doing.
Jacob…I will Contact someone at the aforementioned…lots are former colleagues as they are working a huge story for us with Other Cable News Networks in Unison….I will Find OUT WHY!
With severe weather expected in the area I hope Senators Hawley, Cruz, Lee, Scott, Graham, Blackburn, and others get the message they arenāt the most powerful after the man upstairs, that belongs to Mother Nature. Hopefully none of them land on my front door Iāll let them defend themselves, after all I donāt do well with hypocrites.
More relevant,
This was a knee jerk reaction to the Supreme Court Nomination hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson’s.
He is proposing this law before the April 4th vote on her nomination.
She was criticized in the hearings because when the registry began she wrote papers questioning whether it was punitive or not. She appeared to lean in the direction that they are what they are…;punitive.
Cruz even said that her papers would disrupt the (lie, sic) status quo and weaken sex offender registration laws.
This article explains some of it.
Quote “News media fact-checkers said Senator Hawley was being misleading. Andrew C. McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York who writes for National Review, called Mr. Hawleyās claims āmeritless to the point of demagoguery.ā”
had to look it up, and it fits:
defintion. demĀ·aĀ·gogĀ·uerĀ·y /ĖdemÉĖɔƤɔ(É)rÄ/ noun
Political activity or practices that seek support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument.
“the demagoguery of political opportunists”
Judge Jackson is not pro sex offender, she is pro fairness.
Left this link out:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/30/opinion/jackson-supreme-court-pornography.html
The law will likely actually increase exploitation of children! Penalties are so strict that now women look at framing their husband for CP as the “go to” way to way to initiate their divorce.
A spouse who does so, risks conviction for child pornography.
Itās not that easy to commit a crime and then frame someone else for it.
This is being done by spouses who want sole custody of their kids. I was in federal prison with two guys who were subjected this abuse. It was very easy for the wives to do it bc they sought out the CP on a shared home computer. Who do you think the cops/feds will believe during the interview? The man?! Ha! No fn way will they ever believe “my wife mustve done this bc she wants the kids.”
Truth Seeker, cases of framing someone else by downloading CP, is a pretty easy case to win provided that’s what actually happened. Open access to a shared computer, opens grounds for suspicious activity by anyone, and if the husband wasn’t actually in use of the computer at the time of download, than it’s even better. I have won a Federal case related to being in possession of CP, and it’s because it wasn’t intentional and the jury knew it.
GL…
THANK YOU…PRO-FAIRNESS! IS THE APPROPRIATE VERBIAGE!
…She Was Appointed to the Appellate Side of The Law…Which Is The Most Difficult and Most ‘Slice It and Dice It’ Kind of Aptitude to Comprehend Numerical Codified Statutory Law and How it is Applied…
Therefore, It Takes a Very Prudent and Intellectual Person To Undertake Such Legal Tasks!
…Not Many Have Been Willing to ‘DO IT’
‘SHE GETS IT’
-going to print T-Shirts in Her Honor!
This probably won’t effect most of us. My Crime was almost 32 years ago and been off probation for almost 20 years now. I think our focus is on taking down the registry or at least the retro active application of such.
Heck even if we didn’t have to be on it for life, many of us have given the registry 1/2 of our life already. I have been on the registry now for 25 years. Not so much as a speeding ticket but I am a danger to who again?
Most of the data states re-arrests happen with 3-10 years of being out than why the lifetime punishment being on a registry. Truth doesnāt fit the agenda so they make it up. Only registry I should be on is for voting.
More candidates for Phase 3 of the Media Blitz!
Capt
You might want to start finger stretches because at this rate all politicians will be a part of Operation Truth Media Blitz. Iām sure you are up to the challenge and God Bless you.
I already have 25 on the Phase 3 Media Blitz list and before I’m ready for Phase 3 I’m sure it will grow. I already have 40 that I am educating in my Phase 2 mailings.
*** sigh***….here we go again, the politically correct vigilantes striking again. They want to police everyone but they don’t police themselves.