UPDATE 1-CALL TO ACTION: Volusia County Drafting Ordinance To Expand Residency Restriction to 1,500 Feet in the Unincorporated Parts of Volusia County for People Classified as a Sexual Predator

UPDATE 7/10/2023 – This item was removed from the County Commission Meeting Agenda for 7/11/2023.  We understand that Commissioner Danny Robins and County Attorney Russ Brown are calling for additional research. Please continue to send research studies and your opposition letters to the commissioners and county attorney (contact info below).

Next Volusia County Commission Meeting is August 1.

Major Concerns:

  • Volusia County Council members voted to draft an ordinance that would extend the residency restriction requirement in the unincorporated parts of the county to 1,500 feet for people designated as a sexual predator. You can view the council meeting
  • According to Municode.com, the towns in Volusia County (Deland, Daytona Beach, and New Smyrna Beach) already have 2,500-foot residency restrictions listed below, forcing many people on the sex offender registry, whether labeled as an offender or predator, out to the unincorporated parts of the county. As mentioned at the June 20 council meeting, expanding the residency restrictions to 1,500 feet in the unincorporated area of the county will reduce the available area of affordable housing by approximately 1/3.
  • Daytona Beach: 2,500 feet of any school, child care facility, public park, beach, public or private playground including miniparks and recreational open spaces, library, or church
  • Deland: 2,500 feet of any school, day care center, public park, playground, or public bus stop regardless of whether the school, day care center, public park, playground or public bus stop lies within the city limits of the city of DeLand or unincorporated Volusia County
  • New Smyrna Beach: 2,500 feet of any child care facility, park, playground, or school
  • The next Volusia County Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 11 at 9 am.

 

PLEASE Do the Following:

  • Email, call, or send letters through the U.S. Mail to the Volusia County Council members to let them know that you OPPOSE the expansion of the residency restriction requirement to 1,500 feet in the unincorporated areas of the county for people required to register as a predator.
  • You must include your full name, residential city, and subject (sexual predators residency distance requirement in the unincorporated areas of Volusia County).
  • Ask family members and friends to also contact the council members to OPPOSE this expansion of the state’s 1,000-foot residency restriction requirement to 1,500 feet.
  • If you choose to share any research with the council, the members are probably told NOT to click on links. Therefore, include a 1- to 2-sentence summary along with the title of the study or article that could be used in a google search.  You could also include the link if you choose to do so.
  • IF YOU WRITE AN EMAIL OR LETTER, MAKE SURE THAT IT IS NO LONGER THAN ONE PAGE. YOU CAN CHOOSE TO USE SOME OF THE FOLLOWING TALKING POINTS OR YOU OWN IDEAS.  PLEASE DO NOT JUST COPY/PASTE BUT INDIVIDUALIZE YOUR LETTER.

 

Talking Points:

  • If you live in Florida but not Volusia County, you could mention that you are opposed to increasing the residency restrictions as you do not want to see such a punitive measure spread to your county.
  • If you do not live in Florida, you could mention that you feel extremely uncomfortable traveling to a state that passes laws NOT based on empirically-validated research.
  • ALL research shows that residency restrictions have had no effect on sexual recidivism rates. County ordinances should be based on empirically-validated research.
  • The 1,500 feet will be measured from the outermost boundaries of schools, etc., to the outermost boundaries of one’s residence. It will be a linear (straight line) measure.  Fifteen hundred feet is the equivalent of five adjacent football fields laid end to end.
  • Statute 775.21 defines sexual predators as “repeat sexual offenders, sexual offenders who use physical violence, and sexual offenders who prey on children.”
  • In Florida, there are people classified as “sexual offenders who prey on children” or “predators” who had medically documented dementia at the time of the offense. Florida statute does not allow courts to consider dementia in these cases.
  • Councilman Don Dempsey stated there are people in prison and on the sex offense registry who are innocent, unwilling to play Russian roulette with a jury where a guilty conviction can result in a lifetime sentence. Corroborative evidence is no longer required.  All the child has to say is that their bottom was touched.
  • Councilman Danny Robins said we all want to “save that one child”, but do we do it at expense of the lives of people accused of a sex crime they never committed? Do we do it at the expense of the people who have completed their sentence and are now law-abiding citizens who will never sexually re-offend?
  • We all want to save the one child to whom Councilman Robins is referring, but how far do we take it? Released murderers, perpetrators of domestic violence (whose actions are at times more harmful to a child than certain sex offense cases are), violent gang leaders, armed robbers, etc., are allowed to live anywhere.
  • The sexual recidivism rate for people with a past sex offense is lower than that for all other crimes, with the exception of murder.
  • When threatened with legal challenges, Gainesville and Palm Beach County rolled back their 2500-foot residency restrictions to the state’s 1000 ft, and there has NOT been an increase in sex offenses because of the rollback.
  • In 93% of sex offenses committed against minors, the child knows the perpetrator (family member, school staff, coaching staff, church staff, etc.), debunking the myth of “stranger danger.”
  • Expanding the residency restrictions increases the homeless population. Research shows that being homeless makes it more difficult for people released from prison to reintegrate back into society successfully as law-abiding citizens, thereby increasing their chances of committing another offense.  Such instability makes society less safe.
  • Residency restriction requirements have proven to be ineffective and punitive to people on the registry along with their family members; education is the key to prevention. Preventative programs should be offered in the Volusia County schools, colleges, workplaces, and other public venues to stop the cycle of abuse, raise awareness of the consequences, identify support resources, and ultimately restore families.
  • Councilman Don Dempsey is to be commended for his defense of people required to register.

 

Contact Information for Volusia County Council Members:

Jeff Brower, County Chair – jbrower@volusia.org
Jake Johansson, At-large  jjohansson@volusia.org
Don Dempsey, District 1  ddempsey@volusia.org
Matt Reinhart, District 2 – mreinhart@volusia.org
Danny Robins, District 3 – drobins@volusia.org

Troy Kent, District 4 – tkent@volusia.org
David Santiago, District 5 – dsantiago@volusia.org

County Attorney Russ Brown – rbrown@volusia.org

jbrower@volusia.org; jjohansson@volusia.org; ddempsey@volusia.org; mreinhart@volusia.org; drobins@volusia.org; tkent@volusia.org; dsantiago@volusia.org, rbrown@volusia.org

Phone number for all council members:

386-736-5920

Mailing address for all council members:

County of Volusia
Thomas C. Kelly
Administration Center
123 W. Indiana Ave.
DeLand, FL 32720-4612

 

Some of the research showing residency restrictions are ineffective:

  • Why Maryland does not have residency restrictions – because evidence shows that residency restrictions do NOT help to prevent sexual offenses from occurring because the victims and the offenders, in most situations, know each other. (Maryland Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, “Sex Offender Registry FAQs”, see question 15) https://www.dpscs.state.md.us/onlineservs/sor/frequently_asked_questions.shtml
  • In 2017, the Illinois Task Force reported that research showed that residency restrictions lead neither to reductions in sexual crime nor recidivism. (Illinois December 2017 Sex Offenses & Sex Offender Registration Task Force Final Report, page iv)  http://www.icjia.state.il.us/assets/articles/SOTF_report_final_12292017.pdf
  • “There is no research to support residence restrictions as effective in reducing sexual recidivism. The Minnesota Department of Corrections concluded in one study that ‘during the past 16 years, not one sex offender released from a Minnesota Correctional Facility has been re-incarcerated for a sex offense in which he made contact with a juvenile victim near a school, park, or daycare center close to his home.’”  (“Residency Restrictions for Sexual Offenders in Minnesota:  False Perceptions for Community Safety”, 2016)  MnATSA-Residency-Restrictions-2016.pdf
  • In 2018, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, sex offender residency restrictions were declared unconstitutional. https://floridaactioncommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/OrderGrantingDefsMotiontoDismiss.pdf
  • “Residency restrictions have not accomplished the goals that politicians have promised they would but have caused collateral consequences that can actually make society worse off.” (Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, “No Place to Call Home: Rethinking Residency Restrictions for Sex Offenders”, Gina Puls) https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102&context=jlsj
  • “Residency restrictions should be abolished.” (Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Levenson, Leibowitz, and Grady, 2016, “Grand Challenges: Social Justice and the Need for Evidence-Based Sex Offender Registry Reform”, page 22) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304990286_Grand_Challenges_Social_Justice_and_the_Need_for_Evidence-based_Sex_Offender_Registry_Reform)
  • From the African American Studies Program at the University of South Carolina, “policymakers need to rethink…residency restriction laws and change them to reflect empirical evidence based on the nature of sexual offending…that change could bring about meaningful reductions in homelessness, associated with being a registered sex offender.” (University of South Carolina African American Studies Program, “Sex Offender Residence Restrictions and Homelessness)  https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/african_american_studies/about/news/2019/offender.php Actual Study: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0887403419862334
  • In Broward County, 27.6% of registrants are homeless, and in Miami-Dade, 28.2% are homeless, with residency restrictions being the main obstacle in finding stable housing. OPPAGA-Report-21.pdf  (pages 25-26)

 

Some of the research showing most future sex crimes are committed by people NOT on the registry:

 

Some of the research showing that minors know their perpetrators approximately 93% of the time, i.e., they are not strangers:

 

Some of the research on false allegations of child sexual abuse:

  • “A review of the literature revealed false allegations…numbering between 2 and 8 percent of referrals to child abuse clinics, 6 percent of emergency room referrals, and higher rates (between 36 and 56 percent) for allegations arising out of custody disputes.” (U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, American Journal of Psychotherapy, “False Sexual-Abuse Allegations by Children and Adolescents: Contextual Factors and Clinical Subtypes”, E. J. Mikkelsen, T. G. Gutheil, M. Emens, 1992)  https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/false-sexual-abuse-allegations-children-and-adolescents-contextual
  • “Data suggest that the overwhelming majority of children’s allegations are legitimate and true. But, in certain situations and circumstances, a child may lie and make up false allegations of abuse.  This phenomenon is seen most commonly in child custody cases and in criminal cases.”  (Psychiatric Times, “False Allegations of Sexual Abuse”, Alan D. Blotcky, PhD, 2022) https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/why-some-children-lie-about-sexual-abuse

 

12 thoughts on “UPDATE 1-CALL TO ACTION: Volusia County Drafting Ordinance To Expand Residency Restriction to 1,500 Feet in the Unincorporated Parts of Volusia County for People Classified as a Sexual Predator

  • June 27, 2023 at 9:31 pm
    Permalink

    Deland: Exactly whose courthouse would someone living outside of Deland have to go to for a trial for living within 2500 feet of a forbidden location within Deland? I suppose Century Florida could pass a law forbidding a bait shop from within 2500 feet of a grocery store and the business owner of J & M Bait Shop in Flomation, GA could be extradited into Deland, Florida if his bait shop in GA is within 2500 feet of Food Giant in Century, Florida.

    Reply
  • June 28, 2023 at 9:39 am
    Permalink

    https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/constitution

    SECTION 2. Basic rights.—All natural persons, female and male alike, are equal before the law and have inalienable rights, among which are the right to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property. No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion, national origin, or physical disability.

    In order to possess and protect you property you need to be present at that property or where the property is stored. How do these residency laws override Florida’s constitution and nullify one of its “inalienable right”?

    Reply
  • June 28, 2023 at 10:29 am
    Permalink

    As I watched the video of the commission meeting, I got the distinct impression that most of the commissioners are getting the terms “sexual predator” and “sexually violent predator” mixed up.
    A “sexually violent predator” is a person who has been involuntarily committed to the Jimmy Ryce program for an indefinite period of time. Their risk of reoffense has been deemed to be unusually high; therefore, they have been denied release from custody at the end of their prison sentence and transferred to a mental health sanitarium.
    BUT, a “sexual predator” does not differ much from any other “sexual offender”. The labels are different because the “predator’s” crime(s) was against a person 11 years old or younger.
    AND, this is not automatic. There must be a judgement from the court, either orally pronounced or in writing adjudging the person as a “sexual predator”.
    Some persons who committed crimes against persons under 12 were adjudicated a “sexual offender” by a judge, rather than as a “sexual predator”.
    SO, in reality, there’s not much difference between the two labels.
    But, I’m not sure that the commissioners are aware of that. I think that they hear the word “predator”, and they think it’s a whole different thing.
    What they are thinking of is a “sexually violent predator” — an SVP.
    Just my take on it.

    Reply
    • June 28, 2023 at 4:25 pm
      Permalink

      I read the article. I have no words. There should be, I think, great outrage against the behavior of law enforcement for this.

      Reply
  • June 30, 2023 at 2:26 pm
    Permalink

    Sent an email yesterday and got positive feedback from one of the council members. At least one member is worried about the unintended consequences of this awful ordinance.

    Reply
    • July 1, 2023 at 1:33 pm
      Permalink

      Thank you for this, Ron.

      Reply
  • July 10, 2023 at 6:16 pm
    Permalink

    The proposed SO ordinance was supposed to be on tomorrow’s Volusia Co Council meeting (July 11 ) but has been pulled. One of our board members was told that they wanted longer to study the effectiveness of such an ordinance.

    Volusia Co is listening and wants to do the right thing — make decisions based on research.

    If you have not already done so, keep the calls and emails coming. Share the truth with the Volusia County Council members.

    Reply
  • July 18, 2023 at 4:25 pm
    Permalink

    Came across the new jury instructions from the 11th Circuit about residency restrictions and thought I’d share.

    11.17 UNLAWFUL RESIDENCY BY A SEX OFFENDER §775.215(2) & (3), Fla. Stat.
    To prove the crime of Unlawful Residency by a Sex Offender, the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

    (Defendant) was convicted of
    Give a or b as applicable.
    a. [Florida Statute 794.011] [Florida Statute 800.04] [Florida Statute 827.071 [Florida Statute 847.0135(5)] [Florida Statute 847.0145]
    b. a crime in another jurisdiction other than the State of Florida that is similar to Florida Statute [794.011] [800.04] [827.071] [847.0135(5)] [847.0145]
    The victim of that crime was less than 16 years of age when the crime was committed.
    Give a or b as applicable.
    a. The date that the crime occurred for the defendant’s convict ion of Florida Statute [794.011] [800.04] [827.071] [847.0135(5)] [847.071] was on or after October 1, 2004.
    b. The date that the crime occurred for the defendant’s conviction in another jurisdiction that is similar to Florida Statute [794.011] [800.04] [827.071] [847.0135(5) [847.071] was on or after May 26, 2010.
    After the conviction, (defendant) resided within 1,000 feet of a [school] [child care facility] [park] [playground].

    Reply
  • July 28, 2023 at 11:22 am
    Permalink

    I am not seeing the SO ordinance listed in the agenda for August 1. Possibly it is there but I am overlooking it.

    https://vcservices.vcgov.org/agenda/agendas/20230801/agenda.htm

    I have emailed the sponsor of the ordinance, Bobby Robin, asking if the ordinance will be brought up anytime in the future. I have not heard back from him.

    I am hoping that someone in Volusia Co knows what is going on and will share it with us.

    Thank you.

    Reply
    • July 28, 2023 at 11:58 am
      Permalink

      This is excellent news and exactly what we want to see— off the agenda and nothing from the sponsor I take as signs of progress from our end. Dead proposals don’t always get announced. Stay vigilant!

      Reply
  • August 1, 2023 at 7:21 pm
    Permalink

    They told me to do the same thing. I lived in the woods for a year and a half. I even had to stay in the woods during a hurricane! My PO told me to hang out outside the Sheriff’s Office during the storm but a jerk officer told me to leave! I woke up the next morning half under water! These are the people you hear about that truly enjoy pulling the wings off of flies. Also, because I was required to live in the woods my PO acquired a court order to place me on an electronic monitor. I acquired a permanent residence in 2013 and am still wearing the monitor due to a corrupt judge and assistant start attorney!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *