CA: Janice Bellucci challenges Fresno SORR
The Fresno Bee reports that ACSOL Attorney Janice Bellucci is suing Fresno County over their sex offender residency restriction that prohibits certain people from living within 3,000 feet of places like parks and schools. Fresno County is apparently the 40th municipality that has faced legal challenge over their ordinance and we all know how that worked out for them!
Go Janice!
3k feet? Jesus Christ why not make it a full mile while they are at it? Hell make all sex offenders homeless why not right? This country is turned to crap with these people in office.
Funny I’ve been to Fresno while hiking Yosemite…huge gang problem but nothing is done about that.
Here is a link to the article
https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article239473568.html
Any way to get the article, without having to subscribe to the newspaper?
You can access it via the link I provided. I did not have to sign in to read the article.
Stick It to Them Janice!!! ohh how we need Janice here in Florida!!!
Janice Bellucci believes in the constitution of the United States of America. She clearly believes in words like “Liberty and Justice for ALL”.
Go, Janice, go! Truth and right are on her side.
http://www.casomb.org/docs/Residence_Paper_Final.pdf
Janice is going to be on radio live at THIS MORNING at 10 am California time….Here is the announcement from ACSOL:
Our Website Donate Get Involved Contact Us
ACSOL High-Priority Alert! Listen to Janice on the radio THIS MORNING (Jan 22) at 10am PST
Dear Registrants, Family Members and Supporters –
I was asked this morning to participate today, Jan 22 at 10am PST in a live radio interview on a radio station in Fresno, the Broeske & Musson Show, on KMJ 580 AM or online at
http://www.kmjnow.com/personalities/broeske-musson/
(click the triangular play button at the bottom right of the page)
The show will begin right after the 10 a.m. news and could continue until 11 a.m.
Please call in if you can to 559-490-5800
The subject of the interview is our pending lawsuit challenging residency restrictions in Fresno County which prohibit all registrants from living within 3,000 feet of schools and parks. This includes even temporary stays at local hotels and motels. The county residency restrictions are 50 worse than Jessica’s Law which “only” restricted registrants from living within 2,000 feet of schools and parks. And the CA Supreme Court declared in March 2015 that CDCR could not use a “blanket restriction” against all registrants but instead had to make a case-by-case determination based upon each individual registrant.
Sincerely,
Janice
Thank you. Unfortunately, I can’t get the full article without signing in (subscribing). I was hoping to send the article to several of the men detained in one of the twenty civil commitment centers, throughout the U.S. Maybe another newspaper will pick it up and I can get the article there. Appreciate you responding.
Thank God for leaders like Janice Bellucci.
“The board believes that the rise in homelessness among sex offenders needs attention because it is so closely associated with an increased level of threat to community safety,” the state report says.
Ok, I have a problem with this kind of language. To say what the quote above says is the same as fear mongering. Why? Because it tells people that registered citizens WILL offend again if they are homeless.
How about taking a look back at how things were PRIOR to both Megan’s Law and Jessica’s Law? Before the 1990’s where did people with sex offenses live AFTER prison? Back in their own homes or new homes most likely. There were no residency restrictions back then so how about a statistic of how many of those people re-offended?
That should be the argument against these fairly new restrictions. If there were no issues living near a park or school prior to these child named laws, then why all of a sudden start making these restrictions?
But please, lawyers and everyone else, STOP making it sound as if the public is in MORE danger if registered people are homeless.
I expect that comment (“The board …”) is accurate. Personally, I’d think just about anyone is more dangerous and apt to commit a crime if he or she is homeless. Further, if I became homeless and the Registries were to blame in any way, I absolutely would intentionally harm people. On purpose. As often as I could. Just because.
ANY problems that the Registries cause me are going to be repaid in magnitudes. Just because.
There are studies that have compared recidivism before and after the Registries. They’ve all shown that Registries have protected no one. Just as anyone with a brain can fairly easily figure out.
“Residency restrictions” could never have even the tiniest shred of credibility unless they also included people who have shot people with guns and 100+ other crimes. No one with any sense supports such restrictions.
Message to Registry Supporters/Terrorists: Sic semper tyrannis. “Let’s see how you like it when the fighting is brought to you.”