California FEMALE Teacher Gets Only 3 Months for Sex with Student
A female teacher in California was sentenced to 180 days (which she will have to serve only half) and will NOT have to register as a sex offender for having a sexual relationship with a 16 year old Student.
The story can be found here: http://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/crime/article143230329.html
Who thinks that if instead of an attractive female teacher, the perpetrator had been a male teacher he would have gotten 20 years and a lifetime label?
Another great example of how fouled up the system is. It is getting more dangerous to send your child to school than it is to live next door to a registered citizen.
Great point!
I assume that people will protest the light sentence this teacher got (she doesn’t even have to register as a sex offender!) and demand that the judge be removed from the bench.
Amazing… Let’s just say, HE would have definitely received more than 3 months!!
When I talk about this with my students I tell them that not only do we have a War on Sex – we also have a War on Men. We talk in class about how a woman alone can go in sit in a park and enjoy watching the children play and is not considered suspicious but a man cannot do the same thing. Our society has this idea that there is something wrong with a man doing that. Very, very sad
This reminds me of the Debra Lafave case were she was a teacher, a beautiful woman, but the Judge deemed her ” TOO PRETTY TO GO TO PRISON”. SERIOUSLY??? When was it ever deemed for a man, “too handsome to go to Prison? I have heard of “GOT MONEY??? NO PRISON.” Thanks to Mikey J.
Well, short of being wealthy or connected, there’s no need to wonder if a man would have received a harsher sentence. We know that, with very little margin for error, a man would have received a harsher sentence.
That said, my personal feeling is good for her for escaping the registry. Would not wish it on anyone, except those who have lied to push for and keep the SOR going. They deserve to be on it, at least for a few years. Not to punish them. More so they can have a chance of understanding the monstrosity they have created and be able to work to undo their wrongdoing.
War on men is right….I can’t do ANYTHING without society thinking I have some sort of alternate agenda. It’s aggravating as hell to be second-guessed everywhere I go, and now third-guessed because of this label. I still hear women crying about equality, when really they have all the power. Every woman I know makes more money than me, and if they cry rape I go to jail no matter what, no questions asked.
Now apparently they can have sex with minors and NOT be labeled.
Great.
“Who thinks that if instead of an attractive female teacher, the perpetrator had been a male teacher he would have gotten 20 years and a lifetime label?”
Apparently the district attorney’s office doesn’t:
“…if it were a male with no criminal history and it appeared to be an isolated incident, the sentence would be very similar if not identical.”
That’s from the DA office spokesman Lee Cunningham. He moonlights selling real estate in Brooklyn. If you are interested, there’s a nice bridge that just came on the market that he can show you.
Apparently, this wasn’t her first sexual encounter with an underage student.
https://heatst.com/life/married-teacher-mom-36-sentenced-to-jail-for-having-sex-with-boy-16/?mod=fark_im
“The boy’s family also filed a separate lawsuit against the school district, alleging that Stumph engaged in sexual relations with at least one other student before him. She is also named in the lawsuit.
According to the family’s lawsuit, complaints about her sexual affair with the previous boy were ignored by school administrators, which allowed her to consort with yet another minor. The lawsuit alleges that Stumph “cultivated” her young conquest over several months, encouraging him to trust her. This culminated in an almost year-long sexual tryst from September 2014 to December 2015. The former teacher is also accused of sending the student sexually explicit photos and videos of herself to him during that time.”
If this is true, that makes the DA’s comments about this being an “isolated incident” rather curious.