AMENDED CALL TO ACTION #2 FOR SB 1230 AND HB 1235

For the Senate Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice (SB 1230) and the House Judiciary Committee (HB 1235)

 

WE LEARNED THIS MORNING (JANUARY 30) THAT HB 1235 WAS MOVED OUT OF THE HOUSE JUSTICE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE (NOT BEING VOTED ON) AND HAS GONE STRAIGHT TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.  THIS CALL TO ACTION HAS BEEN AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE.

FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN WORKING ON CONTACTING THE HOUSE JUSTICE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE, YOU HAVE NOT BEEN WASTING YOUR TIME AS WE WILL EVENTUALLY BE CONTACTING ALL 160 LEGISLATORS IF THESE BILLS GO TO THE FLOOR FOR A FINAL VOTE.

 

Even though SB 1230 and HB 1235 have passed favorably in each of their first committees, we learned from last year that now is not the time to give up.  Our FAC legislative chair has been spending days in Tallahassee speaking to our legislators.  Even though there has been no debate so far and no amendments filed that would help us, she is being told by aides and certain legislators that we are being heard through our emails, calls, and our legislative chair’s many visits to their offices.  We are finding that our stories are very impactful in addition to sharing research.  Legislators need to know how the changes presented in these bills will impact us and our families.

NOW IS THE TIME TO CONTINUE CONTACTING THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AT EACH COMMITTEE STOP.  More than one contact, especially to your Florida senator or representative, is just fine.  Call or write daily.  You can provide another example of how you or a family member, or friend would be impacted by these changes, or ask them if the legislator is in favor and why?  If you cannot think of an example, use one from a source, such as Emily Horowitz’s book, Rage to Reason.

Legislators should be guiding FDLE; FDLE does not guide the legislators as the legislators serve you, their constituent.  FDLE wrote these changes and requested these changes.  Let us make sure the legislators know how you or others would be impacted if they pass these proposed changes.

At this time, we ask that you make your contacts to the committee member in the next two committee-member stops.  Contact information is given at the end of this Call to Action.  Keep copies of your emails or notes on your phone calls to be used for future committee contacts.

 

What you need to know about SB 1230 and HB 1235:

 

  • SB 1230 and HB 1235 are identical bills where our legislators are attempting to amend the Sexual Predators Act (FS 775.21) and the Sexual Offenders Act (943.0435).

 

  • Currently, no dates or times have been given for the next committee meetings.  We will post them at floridaactioncommittee.org once we have this information.

 

  • The sponsor of SB 1230 is Senator Jennifer Bradley, representing District 6 (Columbia, Baker, Union, Bradford, Clay, Gilchrist, and Northern Alachua Counties).  The sponsor of HB 1235 is Representative Jessica Baker, representing District 17 (part of Duval County).

 

  • The verbiage “a day includes any part of a calendar day” is back in these bills.  “For the purpose of calculating a temporary residence under this paragraph, the first day that a person abides, lodges, or resides at a place is excluded and each subsequent day is counted.  A DAY INCLUDES ANY PART OF A CALENDAR DAY.

 

  • ANY duration of travel outside the USA is reportable (previously 5 days or more).  The line “5 days” has been struck out.

 

  • Lines 1034-1036 and 1600-1602 in SB 1230 and lines 1034-1036 and 1601-1603 in HB 1235 state that EACH instance of a failure to register or report changes of the required information constitutes a SEPARATE offense.  A single misstep carries a maximum sentence of 5 years.  Someone on the registry could be facing decades in prison for one unintentional, paperwork violation, as it would be unreported each time you register. 

 

  • This entire bill is retroactive in the sense that they will apply to all people on the registry regardless of when they were convicted.  However, they are not retroactive in the sense that someone who did NOT register 4 cars a month before the law passed (if it passes) could be charged with 4 separate offenses.  That part would only apply to registration violations committed after the bill’s effective date.

 

  • Finally, because of the vagueness of lines 1731-1735 in SB 1230 and lines 1733-1737 in HB 1235, we are concerned how this part of the bill might be interpreted by courts.  In particular, the following new language has been added: “To qualify for removal of the registration requirements under this paragraph, a sexual offender described in sub-subparagraph (1) (h) 1.b. must establish that his or her designation has been removed and establish that he or she does not meet the criteria for registration under any other sub-subparagraph under subparagraph (1) (h) 1.”  Those subparagraphs enumerate all offenses which placed people on the registry in the first place; therefore, no person could be removed from the registry since their offense would be listed in sub-subparagraph (1) (h) 1.b.  Does this mean there is no relief?  How would the courts interpret this statement?  We do not have the answers. 

 

Please do the following:

 

  • Email or call members of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice (for SB 1230) and members of the House Judiciary Committee (for HB 1235).

 

  • You will need to give your name.

 

  • If you are a constituent of the legislator you are contacting, make sure you mention that you are.  You can click on these links to find your senator and representative.

 

  • Let the legislators know the reasons why you OPPOSE a particular part of these bills.  Tell them what could happen to you and your family if these bills are not amended.  TELL YOUR STORY.

 

  • If you call in the evening or on a weekend, voicemail will pick up.  Leave a message.  Aides say that voicemails are counted.

 

  • Always be cordial in your communications with the legislators as they are more likely to listen to us.

 

Talking points:

 

The legislators are asking that we let them know how SB 1230 and HB 1235 will impact our lives.  TELL YOUR STORIES.  If you do not have a story to tell, then give a hypothetical story that could happen to you if the above-mentioned concerns we have with these bills are NOT removed.  More than one story would be great to share.

 

We also need for family members, friends, or anyone who would be negatively impacted by the changes being proposed in these bills to tell our legislators what will happen to them if the language is not removed from SB 1230 and HB 1235.

 

Do not try to use every suggestion or piece of information given in this Call to Action.  Pick out what is most important to you.  If you have time to write more than one email or make more than one call, then you could include additional information.

 

PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION OF A DAY:

 

  • If a day includes any part of a calendar day, then a “day” can be a period of one hour or maybe even one minute, as these periods of time are “part of a calendar day.”  This new definition would apply to temporary residences where you “abide, lodge, or reside.”

 

  • One possible scenario: You are in your sister’s wedding which involves being at a temporary residence for Friday, Saturday, and Sunday nights.  Since Friday is the first day, it would not count, but you would technically have to leave by 12:00 am (midnight) on Sunday as any part of Monday would count as a “day.”  What if your flight is canceled?  Use other scenarios that you can think of that would apply to your life if this part of these bills is not amended.  TELL YOUR STORY.

 

  • What do you do if it is a 3-day holiday weekend and your registration office is not open?  And you have a family emergency come up?  TELL YOUR STORY.  If you do not have one, then describe hypothetically how such a situation could be disastrous for you.  Include family members’ stories.

 

  • If Florida legislators want people on the registry to remain compliant, then change the word “day” to “business day.”  In lines 571-575 of SB 1230 and HB 1235, “If the sexual predator is in the custody of a local jail, the custodian of the local jail shall register the sexual predator within 3 BUSINESS DAYS after intake of the sexual predator…”  If the custodian of a jail is given 3 business days, then why aren’t people on the registry, who are trying to remain compliant, also given 3 business days?  TELL YOUR STORY OF WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU OR A FAMILY MEMBER WHO COULD NOT RE-REGISTER OR REGISTER A CHANGE BECAUSE THE OFFICE WAS CLOSED.

 

PERTAINING TO HAVING EACH INCIDENCE OF FAILURE TO REGISTER OR REPORT CHANGES COUNTING AS A SEPARATE OFFENSE:

 

  • These are paperwork felonies with each separate one coming with a maximum of 5 years in prison.

 

  • One possible scenario: Your wife receives a new license plate with her renewed car registration and forgets to tell you.  You re-register 3 times, not knowing that her car has a new license plate.  Law enforcement comes to your home and sees the license plate that you have not registered at any of your 3 previous re-registrations.  You have now committed 3 paperwork felonies that could land you in prison for 15 years.  TELL YOUR OWN STORY ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO YOU OR COULD HAPPEN TO YOU IN THE FUTURE IF THIS LANGUAGE STAYS IN THESE BILLS.

 

  • Other benign violations that could land someone on the registry in prison for years if there is more than one occurrence:

 

  • Failure to maintain a driver’s license or identification card
  • Failure to provide an email address or an internet identifier
  • Failure to provide a phone number
  • If the wording “each incident is counted as a separate offense” remains in these bills, some people on the registry who are not sexually re-offending will end up with longer prison sentences than that for some non-sexual, violent offenders.  How is sending people on the registry to prison for years for these paperwork felonies making society safer?

 

PERTAINING TO THE POSSIBILITY OF A COURT INTERPRETING LINES 1733-1737 IN SB 1230 AND HB 1235 AS SAYING THAT NO ONE CAN BE REMOVED FROM THE REGISTRY IN FLORIDA DURING THEIR LIFETIME:

 

  • The following new language has been added: “To qualify for removal of the registration requirements under this paragraph, a sexual offender described in sub-subparagraph (1) (h) 1.b. must establish that his or her designation has been removed and establish that he or she does not meet the criteria for registration under any other sub-subparagraph under subparagraph (1) (h) 1.”  Subparagraph (1)(h) 1. enumerates all offenses which placed people on the registry in the first place, meaning you cannot be removed from the registry because your offense will be listed in “any other sub-paragraph under subparagraph (1)(h) 1.”  Does this mean there is no relief possible in the courts?  We would have to see how this plays out in the courts.

 

  • For our members who do not understand the first-bullet paragraph above this one, then you could copy and paste.  Those people who do understand it, though, please add information in your own words.  TELL YOUR STORY if you have one.  For those of you who are only a few years away from being able to petition for removal from the registry, describe what will happen to you and your family if courts in Florida will no longer allow for such removal because of the wording in these bills.

 

Contact information for members of the Senate Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice for SB 1230:

 

  1.  Senator Jennifer Bradley (R) Chair:  bradley.jennifer.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5006
  2.  Senator Bobby Powell (E) Vice Chair:  powell.bobby.web@flsenate.gov; (850) 487-5024
  3.  Senator Dennis Baxley (R):  baxley.dennis.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5013                            
  4.  Senator Danny Burgess (R):  burgess.danny.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5023
  5.  Senator Ed Hooper (R):  hooper.ed.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5021
  6.  Senator Jonathan Martin (R):  martin.jonathan.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5033
  7.  Senator Jason W. B. Pizzo (D):  pizzo.jason.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5037
  8.  Senator Darryl Ervin Rouson (D):  rouson.darryl.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5016
  9.  Senator Victor M. Torres, Jr. (D):  torres.victor.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5025
  10. Senator Clay Yarborough (R):  yarborough.clay.web@flsenate.gov;  (850) 487-5004

 

bradley.jennifer.web@flsenate.gov; powell.bobby.web@flsenate.gov; baxley.dennis.web@flsenate.gov; burgess.danny.web@flsenate.gov; hooper.ed.web@flsenate.gov; martin.jonathan.web@flsenate.gov; pizzo.jason.web@flsenate.gov; rouson.darryl.web@flsenate.gov; torres.victor.web@flsenate.gov; yarborough.clay.web@flsenate.gov

 

Contact information for the House Judiciary Committee:

 

  1. Tommy Gregory (R) Chair:  Tommy.Gregory@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5072
  2. Tobin Overdorf (R) Vice Chair:  Toby.Overdorf@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5085
  3. Randall Maggard (R) Republican Committee Whip:  Randy.Maggard@myfloridahouse.gov; (850) 717-5054
  4. Michael Gottlieb (D) Democratic Ranking Member: Michael.Gottlieb@myfloridahouse.gov;  850-717-5102
  5. Thad Altman (R):  Thad.Altman@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5032
  6. Kristen Arrington (D):  Kristen.Arrington@myfloridahouse.gov; (850) 717-5046
  7. Webster Barnaby (R):  Webster.Barnaby@myfloridahouse.gov;  850-717-5029
  8. Adam Botana (R):  Adam.Botana@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5080
  9. LaVon Bracy Davis (D):  LaVon.BracyDavis@myfloridahouse.gov; 850-717-5040
  10. Chuck Brannan (R):  Chuck.Brannan@myfloridahouse.gov;  850-717-5010
  11. Ryan Chamberlin(R):  Ryan.Chamberlin@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5024
  12. Kevin Chambliss (D):  Kevin.Chambliss@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5117
  13. Mike Giallombardo (R):  Mike.Giallombardo@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5079
  14. Dianne Hart (D):  Dianne.Hart@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5063
  15. Yvonne Hinson (D):  Yvonne.Hinson@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5021
  16. Berny Jacques (R):  Berny.Jacques@myfloridahouse.gov;   850-717-5059
  17. Dotie Joseph (D):  Dotie.Joseph@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5108
  18. Patt Maney (R):  Patt.Maney@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5004
  19. Bobby Payne (R):  Bobby.Payne@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5020
  20. William Robinson (R):  Will.Robinson@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5071
  21. John Snyder (R):  John.Snyder@myfloridahouse.gov;  (850) 717-5086
  22. Paula Stark (R):  Paula.Stark@myfloridahouse.gov; 850-717-5047
  23. Keith Truenow (R):  Keith.Truenow@myfloridahouse.gov; 850-717-5026

 

Tommy.Gregory@myfloridahouse.gov; Toby.Overdorf@myfloridahouse.gov; Randy.Maggard@myfloridahouse.gov; Michael.Gottlieb@myfloridahouse.gov; Thad.Altman@myfloridahouse.gov; Kristen.Arrington@myfloridahouse.gov; Webster.Barnaby@myfloridahouse.gov; Adam.Botana@myfloridahouse.gov; LaVon.BracyDavis@myfloridahouse.gov; Chuck.Brannan@myfloridahouse.gov; Ryan.Chamberlin@myfloridahouse.gov; Kevin.Chambliss@myfloridahouse.gov; Mike.Giallombardo@myfloridahouse.gov; Dianne.Hart@myfloridahouse.gov; Yvonne.Hinson@myfloridahouse.gov; Berny.Jacques@myfloridahouse.gov; Dotie.Joseph@myfloridahouse.gov; Patt.Maney@myfloridahouse.gov; Bobby.Payne@myfloridahouse.gov; Will.Robinson@myfloridahouse.gov; John.Snyder@myfloridahouse.gov; Paula.Stark@myfloridahouse.gov; Keith.Truenow@myfloridahouse.gov

 

20 thoughts on “AMENDED CALL TO ACTION #2 FOR SB 1230 AND HB 1235

  • January 30, 2024 at 3:45 pm
    Permalink

    Can we copy and past the emails into a blind cc and send this to ourselves so it goes out to each individually or do we have to go one by one.

    Reply
    • January 30, 2024 at 3:50 pm
      Permalink

      Sounds good no worries just saw the listing but good to go.

      Reply
  • January 30, 2024 at 3:48 pm
    Permalink

    Mass emails such as blind cc often are rejected by their system. One by one may be the only effective way to reach them.

    Reply
  • January 30, 2024 at 8:48 pm
    Permalink

    Well, if this restrictive law passes, and let’s hope that the legislators come to their senses and realize that it is practically impossible not to violate – but if it passes. then I hope that the lawyers for the. current federal doe v. SWEARINGEN case with plaintiffs that have prior to 1997 convictions can call a hearing with the judge to present this change as even more conclusive proof of continue violation doctrine.

    Reply
  • January 31, 2024 at 8:38 am
    Permalink

    I re-registered yesterday in Hillsborough County. The deputies I spoke to there about this bill stated they absolutely do not want this to pass. They said it would be chaos to deal with. Those were there words, not mine.

    Reply
    • February 4, 2024 at 10:06 pm
      Permalink

      Your right. They helped someone or were lied to about age. And putting them in a facility is horrific. Profiting from them being locked up. Probation pleas…they take a plea then get rearrested called crazy menace to society may get in trouble again? That’s what they said. He may get in trouble again. And Dunkerly used science again. Didn’t call us to help our son to speak 9nbhis behalf. Someone help. Omg. It’s horrific.

      Reply
  • February 4, 2024 at 8:44 am
    Permalink

    I just sent the following E-mail to all the on the list, I hope this will perhaps makes things a little personal for them to see.

    I am writing to you regarding the above proposed legislation.

    I am a former Investigator with the State of Florida; however, over 15 years ago I was sent a link to my E-mail that contained underage images, after I deleted them I was subject to Investigation. Because I did not report the incident, I was charged and sentenced to 78 months in Prison. This destroyed my Professional career in Law Enforcement and Investigative work, with over 17 years experience.

    As I am, nor ever was, attracted to underage children, I still had and still have to pay a great price for this mistake. I am sure there are many people on the Registry who simply made a mistake and are not criminals and are trying to just get on with their life. Life is most difficult with the current restrictions in place by the Sex Offender Laws (SOL), living restrictions make it impossible to secure a decent place to live, I was lucky, as I already had a residence in place and my wife stuck with me through this, but there are many that was not as lucky as I was. Further, travel is difficult, as the restrictions make it almost impossible to comply with. With additional restrictions, this will hinder individuals on the registry to try to move forward with their lives and try to live a more normal life, which is quite impossible.

    Without going into too much detail, as I know each and everyone of you are busy, I would simply implore you NOT to vote Yes on this legislation, as it would negatively hurt many individuals, including myself to try to move on from this and live a more normal life. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Respectfully Yours,

    Reply
    • February 9, 2024 at 6:03 pm
      Permalink

      A moving story, big J. Thank you. This is what they need to hear.

      Reply
  • February 4, 2024 at 7:12 pm
    Permalink

    I wanted to share a direct response that I received, so it is so important for everyone to share their story an make this personal, below is what I received:

    Thank you very much for your email and input on this important issue. I really appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me SB – 1230 Sexual Predators and Sexual Offenders. I appreciate you taking the time to share your story with me and will keep your opinions in mind should this bill be put on agenda in my committee. This inbox is monitored regularly, however, due to the high volume of emails we receive, it is sometimes difficult to reply in a timely manner. If you are a resident of Senate District 23 and you need assistance with a state government issue, please contact my office at (850) 487-5020.

    Your involvement and opinion on issues facing our state and community are critical to helping our office better advocate for our constituents in Tallahassee. Please know my team and I are always here to take the time to understand and listen to those we represent.

    Please do not ever hesitate to contact me if I can ever be of assistance and it is an honor to serve you in the State Senate.

    Kindest regards,

    Danny Burgess

    State Senator, District 23

    Kimberly Simon

    Senior District Legislative Aide

    Senator Danny Burgess

    38507 Fifth Avenue

    Zephyrhills, Florida 33542

    (813) 779-7059

    (850) 487-5023

    Reply
    • February 4, 2024 at 10:02 pm
      Permalink

      People getting paid to lock you up in mental hospital instead of on probation is horrific. You take a plea serve your time then the state comes after you DCF and locks you up. Florida is 3 strike law. A judge sentenced you for probation. You take a plea the state offers it. Then they double Jeopardy. Yes because they agreed to sentence. And cone back give you more time. I’m right you know it. That is double Jeopardy. Release the guys that got probation. And have strikes left. To receive treatment on outside. It’s civil rights law and y’all know it. Yes it’s double Jeopardy. Rearrest for same crime. Is wrong.

      Reply
  • February 6, 2024 at 3:28 pm
    Permalink

    2pm this Thursday SB1230 on hearing agenda for Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice

    Reply
    • February 8, 2024 at 10:44 am
      Permalink

      So if I am reading correctly, the legislators have now struck the language from the bill that would not have provided an offender to petition the court for removal after 25 years.

      Reply
      • February 9, 2024 at 10:42 am
        Permalink

        Kyle M is right. We now have a partial win.

        One down, two to go.

        Reply
  • February 8, 2024 at 7:27 pm
    Permalink

    So after watching the Senate forum today, not one word was spoken about the definition of a Day. Perhaps and in my opinion, the most important part of the bill. Surely these Senators are reading the bill right? Everything that was in the bill, Vehicles, Travel, Separate Offenses, responding to written correspondance for address verification and registry removal was mentioned in the overview except: Definition of a day.
    Why was this left out? This perhaps effects Registrants the most and is currently waiting on a ruling from Judge Hinkle.

    Lost for words…

    Reply
  • February 8, 2024 at 7:55 pm
    Permalink

    One thing that scares me the most is the potential requirement to respond to FDLE snail mail. That’s because, in my neighborhood, I only get about 80% of my mail. My mail carriers don’t like to deliver when the weather’s bad or even rainy. And, they sometimes just lose it. I’ve subscribed to the USPS email service (https://reg.usps.com/entreg/RegistrationPortalAction_input) that shows me the mail that’s on the way because of this. I sure hope that service continues to be reliable.

    Reply
    • February 9, 2024 at 8:35 am
      Permalink

      It would have to come certified for them to hold you responsible for the mail in my opinion. As you said mail gets lost all the time. So I think in order for you to get dinged on this you would have had to sign something stating you got it and then not reply.

      [Moderator’s note: Florida Action Committee is not a law firm. We are not attorneys and the information provided on this website is not to be construed as legal advice. The posts and comments are the opinions of the respective authors and should not be relied upon without seeking proper legal guidance from a licensed professional. For a list of qualified attorneys, please see our referral page].

      Reply
      • February 9, 2024 at 11:30 am
        Permalink

        I received one of those letters from FDLE more than 15 years ago, and only once. It was sent via regular mail. I don’t think they’d be willing to pay the additional expense to send them certified in the future.

        Reply
        • February 9, 2024 at 1:45 pm
          Permalink

          Then they can not prove nor disprove you received the correspondence.

          Reply
  • February 11, 2024 at 10:46 pm
    Permalink

    -And what’s the current criteria in order to petition removal from the registry ?

    I may be wrong, but I thought that the 25 years period to petition removal was only for the Romeo and Juliet designations.

    And I think it should NOT be called a “registry” since it is not a registration done by choice, it is a forced sentence. Specifically for those whose conviction are from prior to 1993.

    Reply
    • February 12, 2024 at 10:10 am
      Permalink

      The Romeo and Juliet provision for removal is completely unrelated to the 25-year removal provision and applies in a very narrow range of cases. In order to be eligible to petition the circuit court for removal from the requirement to register, at least 25 years must have passed from the end of all sanctions imposed in the case (including probation, if any), and the petitioner must not have been arrested for any misdemeanor or felony offenses since release. In addition, the petitioner must not have been convicted of any of an enumerated list of offenses (including kidnapping, human trafficking, sexual battery, and certain lewd and lascivious offenses under F.S. 800.04, among others), and the removal must not conflict with federal law (basically, the petitioner’s independent duty to register under Federal SORNA must have expired).

      If all of these requirements have been met, then the petitioner may seek removal in the circuit court where the original offense was adjudicated (for a Florida offense) or in the circuit court where the petitioner resides (for an out-of-state offense). A copy of the petition must be served on the state attorney of the circuit. The court may grant or deny relief if the court determines that the petitioner is no longer a threat to public safety. This is just a summary of the statute. For full details, please consult the statute itself: F.S. 943.0435, near the end.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *