11th Circuit Says a Sheriff Violated the First Amendment by Posting Warning Signs on the Lawns of Registered Sex Offenders
Old news, but good article…
Unfortunately, legislators typically show about as much judgment as Long when they target people convicted of sex offenses, who are hounded by myriad requirements and restrictions long after they have completed their sentences. Those policies, which include the registries themselves as well as residence restrictions and a panoply of occupational disqualifications, are likewise supposed to protect public safety. But as with Long’s yard signs, there is little evidence that they work as advertised. Instead they impose punishment in the guise of regulation, undermining rehabilitation by demanding perpetual ostracism.
Ah yes, the whole “compelled speech” thing. The government can display words on our license and use the internet, but not on our person nor on private property. At least there is some logic to it. I wonder what the ruling would be if the sign was on property owned by the government, like a sidewalk or median?
I read something interesting the other day: Judges routinely don’t determine whether or not a law is effective, only if it’s constitutional. Thought that was interesting…
We should file suit on just this issue for yard signs, branded driver license for all registered persons. FAC anyway we can find an attorney to take this up I will donate the first $500.