“Sex Offender Exclusion Zones” in Brevard County Florida

Weekly Update #99

Dear Members and Advocates,

This week a “fire” erupted and we saw an example of why it is so important we stay organized and able to mobilize quickly. Brevard County is seeking to amend their proximity ordinance to allow private businesses to register themselves as “child oriented”, thereby establishing itself as a landmark around which a 1000 foot proximity ordinance will be created. In other words, persons required to register will not be able to go within 1000 feet of these businesses, including any other residence or business located within that 1000 foot exclusion zone.

Brevard already has a proximity ordinance around schools, parks and playgrounds, but this new proposed amendment would expand that to private businesses where children congregate. Under Brevard’s current ordinance it’s difficult to find a place to dine out, shop, get a haircut or be present that’s not already within an exclusion zone. This new amendment will only make it worse.

Thankfully we learned of the proposal in advance of it’s introduction before the Commission and we had the opportunity to send a letter in opposition (putting it on the record) and know that several of our members did the same. As it advances through the legislative process, it is critical that we organize and show up to future meetings at which this legislation will be considered. If nobody shows up to oppose it, it will pass. If we show up, armed with facts, research and showing opposition, we have a good chance of preventing it from passing. It’s up to us. We need to write in and we need to show up!

Some of you might be reading this and wondering why, if you don’t live in Brevard, this would concern you. It does. More than 17 years ago when the City of Miami Beach enacted the first residency restriction, the City of Miami then enacted their own restriction to avoid a perceived influx of registrants from Miami Beach. Like a fast metastasizing cancer, residency restrictions began spreading throughout the country as each municipality raced to enact a harsher restriction than their neighbor so they would not become a dumping ground. Allowing this to pass in one county will create a domino effect that will inevitably reach your county. If we don’t stick up for our members in Brevard, how can we expect anyone to stick up for us when our lives are impacted?

At this point, what we are asking our members to do is to reach out to the Brevard County Commissioners and voice your opposition to the proposed amendment to the “sex offender exclusion zone”. A copy of our Call to Action can be found here. The letters we have written as an organization can be found here and here. When details of the next meeting at which the proposed legislation will be discussed are announced, we will share that information on our site or in an email and ask that you please show up and speak out.

The situation in Brevard brings to light another sad and unfortunate reality we face. There are A LOT of issues that registrants face. We have restrictions and requirements at the federal level, we have restrictions and requirements under state statutes and we have restrictions and requirements under municipal ordinances. If we bring a challenge to a federal law (such as International Megan’s Law) it will benefit every registrant in the US. If we bring a challenge to a Florida law (such as in-person registration or the 3-day “residency” definition) it benefits every registrant in the state of Florida. If we bring a challenge to a municipal ordinance (such as this Brevard ordinance) it will have a direct impact on those living in that municipality, but… it won’t necessarily benefit those in other municipalities.

Which brings us to the dilemma we face as a board. We have a finite amount of resources, both human and capital. With a limited amount of money in our general legal budget, do we apply it to the Brevard proximity ordinance, the posted signs in front of houses in Bradford, counties that won’t let parents into their children’s schools, the Halloween ordinance in Duval, or a county that charges a fee for registering? All of these are very important issues and all have disturbing consequences. How can we, as an organization, make the “Sophie’s choice” of pursuing one challenge over another?

Since we are the Florida Action Committee, our Legal Committee has always tried to focus on challenges that have the broadest impact on Florida registrants. Even though we might initiate a challenge to residency restrictions in Miami-Dade, most (if not all) counties in Florida have a residency restriction and would benefit from a win there. It’s just that Miami-Dade’s is the most notorious (think Julia Tuttle Causeway) and offensive (more than 25% of the registrants in that county are homeless) and where the attorneys that agreed to pick up the challenge (the ACLU) happen to be located, which is why it was filed in Miami-Dade.

On a daily basis we receive so many calls, emails and referrals with heartbreaking personal stories. All are important to us but we don’t have the money or manpower to help everyone. The global solution would be for the registry to be abolished, but until that happens we need to chip away at it by going after the lowest hanging fruit. Deciding what that “lowest hanging fruit” is has been an emotional burden.

Unfortunately, Covid hasn’t afforded us the opportunity to do in-person meet and greets but that does not mean the local momentum needs to be put on hold. Over the coming months, we are calling on all of you to strengthen your local network. Find out who your FAC county or regional coordinators are and connect with them (you can contact membership@floridaactioncommittee.org to find out). If you don’t have a county or regional coordinator, consider becoming one. Just think… there are 800 registrants in Brevard. If we could engage all of them to pool resources (even $20 a person) to fight the ordinance, we would be in really good shape to mount a challenge. We only wish it were that easy. We first need to bring in those 800 and that involves a grassroots effort.

The good news is that FAC is a member-run organization and we all have a voice. We are also asking you to write in or call to let us know which issues (other than the challenges listed on our site) you would want us to take on. It’s your member dues and donations that drive this organization and enables us to fight the registry, so let your voice be heard!

Sincerely,

The Florida Action Committee


Reminders:

BREVARD Strategic Planning Meeting – Monday July 27th at 7pm ET.  Dial 319-527-3487.  We will introduce your key volunteers and coordinators in Brevard County.  We will cover the information received to date, and identify what other information is needed to support the registered citizens and their families in Brevard.  What we need from you are volunteers, resources, and commitment.  If unable to connect, text “Call Me” to 319-527-3487 to receive a call-back and be connected to the conference.

Tuesday July 28 2:00 pm ET. There are 3 weeks left in the FAMM and Florida Cares Summer Camp taught by Greg and Denise each Tuesday through August 11th aimed at teaching families and directly impacted folks about the legislative process, bills, candidates and about criminal justice reform in Florida so that everyone can be make the most educated and informed decisions in 2020 regarding their incarcerated loved one and advocate for them in the best way possible.   IMPORTANT: You must register for each class and classes are limited so sign up TODAY! ⇢ Link to register for the FAMM & Florida Cares Summer Camp Classes  After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Thursday Aug 6 at 8pm ET- FAC Monthly Member Call. Dial 319-527-3487.  If unable to connect, text “Call Me” to 319-527-3487.  You will receive a call-back and be connected to the conference. Guest Lisa Anne Zilney, PhD.  She will present on her most recent research with male and female registrants, and discuss her latest book Impacts of Sex Crime Laws on the Female Partners of Convicted Offenders: Never Free of Collateral Consequences

Saturday Aug 8 from 11am-1pm ET.  Family Support Session via Zoom (non-registrants only – intended for family members and others with loved ones on the Registry.  Must be FAC member and RSVP to anita@floridaactionactioncommittee.org to receive Zoom link.

Thursday Aug 13 at 8pm ET- FAC New Member Orientation Call. Dial 319-527-3487.  If unable to connect, text “Call Me” to 319-527-3487.  You will receive a call-back and be connected to the conference.

SOME HEADLINES FROM THE WEEK

 U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division

The U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division claims they uphold the Constitutional rights of all people in the United States (note the emphasis on “all” was theirs, not ours). Let’s see if that’s true! Today, in the United States, there are almost one million…

Feds kept quiet reports of ‘staff-on-child’ sex abuse at Miami-Dade detention center

At least four Central American immigrant children reported being sexually abused by staff members at the privately run Homestead detention center for unaccompanied minors, the Miami Herald reports. No one went to prison for these alleged crimes. No one was prosecuted….

Frightening number of Coronavirus cases in Florida prisons

Union officials at Federal Correctional Complex Coleman and Federal Correctional Institution Miami sounded the alarm on just how bad the conditions are inside the facilities. Kareen Troitino, the FCI Miami corrections officer union president, told ABC News that the…

SCOTUS declines to intervene in Florida voting dispute

Not that it matters to our population, since Amendment 4 discriminates against people with past convictions for sexual offenses, but today the Supreme Court declined to intervene in a ping pong match between the Florida Governor and tens of thousands of…

8 thoughts on ““Sex Offender Exclusion Zones” in Brevard County Florida

  • July 23, 2020 at 2:52 pm
    Permalink

    And just how is someone supposed to know which businesses are supposedly “child oriented”? Would be a bit of a stretch to arrest some random people from out of town just because they decided to stop at the hardware store that happened to be next door to an ice cream shop.

    Reply
    • July 23, 2020 at 3:58 pm
      Permalink

      Such an arrest would not be a stretch at all. As FAC reported a few months ago,

      “One particularly disturbing recent arrest was in Brevard County, where a man was arrested for violating their 1000 foot proximity ordinance. His arrest form reads, ‘On Saturday, 03 August 2019, at approximately 0832 hours, I received a call from Deputy Ouellette, who informed me that Mr. XXXX XXXX XXXX (Arrestee) was eating breakfast at the Burger King located at 380 East Merritt Island Causeway, Merritt Island, Brevard County, Florida, and this property is within 1,000 feet of a tennis court.’ Essentially he was eating breakfast too close to a tennis court located inside the Fitness Club Merritt Island.”

      Reply
    • July 23, 2020 at 4:31 pm
      Permalink

      It is this vagueness that helps to win lawsuits against these counties. Most of these counties do not have the legal talent such as what you might find in Miami or Gainesville or other areas of our state. My experience is that I know more about the laws pertaining to people on the sex offense registry than the county lawyers do, who advise the local politicians.

      I had a conversation a few months ago with one of our experienced attorneys in this area who said that almost all of these smaller counties have sex offense ordinances that could be taken down so easily but it is the money that it would take to bring on these lawsuits.

      Reply
      • July 23, 2020 at 6:29 pm
        Permalink

        It just seems to me that a win against a single county would have a domino effect on other counties that could be knocked down simply with a letter, as Janice Belucci showed in California. Am I wrong?

        Reply
  • July 23, 2020 at 4:08 pm
    Permalink

    Pulling on the strings of the registry to acquire recognition for elections is a sure sign of someone that’s not very smart and has no imagination.
    The Mayor of Kansas City Missouri is in the process of drawing up legislation to criminalize doxing of police. QuintonLucasKC. It will be discussed on the TV at KCTV news at 4 p.m And 6 pm.
    If doxing becomes a criminal offense , would that not make the registry also illegal. It may be interesting to see where this goes. Doxing and the registry are exactly the same.
    If this is allowed to stand all these other fights may be for nought.
    Quinton Lucas is a very level headed person that is very well respected and couldn’t care less about what is politically advantageous. When he sets out to do something you better just step aside.

    Reply
    • July 23, 2020 at 8:02 pm
      Permalink

      After considering the information from KCTV. The Mayor and council had determined that doxing which is the publishing of private information for the purposes of bullying is dangerous to the individual and there families so should be considered a crime. The law is specifically targeted at any government employees. But the comments on Mayor Lucas are saying if it applies to them it should apply to anyone else. So they are drawing up a law to make it illegal. It is expected to be drawn up and no doubt will pass. If this happens I don’t see how any court in the country can say the registry is not punishment. They would first have to challenge the legality of this law. If doxing is a crime so is the registry. Do away with the registry and you also do away with residence restrictions. Problem solved.

      Reply
  • July 23, 2020 at 4:59 pm
    Permalink

    The original lies that brought about the Registries is that they were needed so the public would be “informed”. All experts and intelligent people knew that wasn’t needed or useful. All knew that “informing” was just the beginning of their lies. Did we all know that they wouldn’t be able to stop playing with their harassment toy until they broke it?

    I can’t say that I foresaw that. I was shocked when the first “residency restrictions” “law” was passed. I couldn’t believe such a thing could happen in America. But obviously I was naive, given that actual, legal racial segregation existed when I was born and was very active. And America has a full, complete, sordid history of such hate and stupidity.

    Anyway, the Registries are war. Decent, moral people don’t support Registries. The “people” who do are enemies of all decent, moral Americans. They should always be treated as such.

    I’ve promised myself that if I’m ever arrested for anything related to the Registries, even if it is my fault (such as the recent case reported where the guy just forgot a check-in), I’m going to very seriously retaliate. I’ve promised myself that their arrest won’t be worth it for anyone. This is the way it must be. It is moral and right. I keep promises to myself.

    These criminal regimes need to be praying daily that they don’t arrest me. They need to ensure it. If every single person who is Registered adopted that, things would look differently. The time to tolerate the Registries ended long ago.

    Reply
  • July 23, 2020 at 10:10 pm
    Permalink

    This sounds like a very bad chain reaction law. In other words, they may take it that 1 business is off limits initially, than any other corresponding businesses also within 1,000ft. of the first is also off limits, and quite possibly any businesses within 1,000ft. of those are also off limits. Law enforcement and the judiciary system cannot comprehend the law with a grain of salt, and could easily arrest and prosecute people based on this possible misinterpretation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *